Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional challenge
M35/2014 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
2015-08-04
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| gptkbp:discusses |
legal scholars
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
implied rights
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
political campaign regulations
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 35)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
subsequent legal decisions
political communication laws |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J none freedom of expression unanimous law journals Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
proportionality test
freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
constitutional interpretation
represented by barristers represented by solicitors |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_law
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
freedom of speech
landmark case legal textbooks political rights impact on future legislation political campaign finance regulation of political advertising |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
upheld the law upheld the law's validity |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Gordon_J
Bell_J_and_Gageler_J French_CJ_and_Kiefel_J Keane_J_and_Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2015-06-03
|