Statements (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 32)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
public interest
freedom of speech election laws political advertising regulations democratic_process |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J unanimous Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
proportionality test
freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public discourse
public policy judicial independence democratic values government accountability legal frameworks judicial review civil liberties judicial scrutiny legal standards government regulation constitutional amendments legal interpretations legal precedent constitutional challenges constitutional rights judicial activism judicial reasoning constitutional provisions constitutional interpretation constitutional democracy political rights legislative intent case law development legal doctrines rights protection constitutional validity judicial principles constitutional safeguards limitations on rights political communication framework rights balancing |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_constitutional_law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
in_Australian_law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|