Statements (28)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
McCloy
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 31)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on electoral laws
on political communication rights |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
constitutional law
proportionality test freedom of political communication validity of laws |
| gptkbp:outcome |
decision in favor of the appellant
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established principles of law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Coleman_v_Power
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation gptkb:Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales gptkb:Unions_NSW_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
State of New South Wales
|
| gptkbp:significance |
influential_case_in_Australian_law
|
| gptkbp:year |
2015
|