Statements (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 30)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
campaign finance laws
freedom of speech election laws political advertising regulations |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Patrick_Keane
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Gageler gptkb:Justice_Michelle_Gordon gptkb:Chief_Justice_Robert_French gptkb:Justice_Virginia_Bell gptkb:Justice_Susan_Kiefel unanimous |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
proportionality test
freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
civic engagement
public discourse public policy social justice access to justice human rights judicial independence public interest public trust in government checks and balances judicial review separation of powers civil liberties equality before the law freedom of expression political participation rule of law fair trial rights legal accountability legal certainty due process government regulation government transparency legal remedies voter rights political accountability judicial activism electoral integrity constitutional interpretation constitutional democracy political equality judicial restraint political rights constitutional validity limitations on rights democratic_principles |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_constitutional_law
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
in_Australian_law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:Unions_NSW_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|