Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 27)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on freedom of speech
on campaign finance laws on political donations regulation on public interest advocacy on_Australian_constitutional_law |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
constitutionality of electoral funding laws |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
appellant represented by solicitors
respondent represented by solicitors |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
public policy
civil rights government accountability judicial review freedom of assembly freedom of expression political participation rights of citizens election integrity political representation government regulation voter rights election laws judicial interpretation political accountability constitutional challenges constitutional rights political expression freedom of association electoral integrity political rights transparency in political funding public trust in elections accountability in elections political communication rights political campaign laws political funding laws regulation of political parties democratic_processes democratic_rights Australian_constitutional_law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
[2015] HCA 34
(2015) 256 CLR 178 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the validity of laws
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|