Statements (61)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
(2015) 256 CLR 178 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 25)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on democracy
on freedom of speech on campaign finance laws on political donations regulation |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
constitutionality of electoral funding laws |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
judicial independence
political discourse public interest regulatory frameworks public trust in government judicial review civil liberties equality before the law fundamental rights political participation political reform rights of citizens government oversight legal accountability political representation government regulation political accountability voter engagement freedom of association electoral reform judicial activism electoral integrity constitutional interpretation constitutional democracy political equality political rights civil rights advocacy political ethics political freedoms law and politics case law development accountability in governance political accountability mechanisms political communication rights transparency in politics democratic_processes Australian_constitutional_law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the validity of laws
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|