Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal case
constitutional challenge M30/2014 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
affirmed lower court ruling |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
doctrine of implied rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 24)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
political advertising regulations
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J none unanimous July 1, 2015 Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
implied constitutional freedom |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
freedom of expression
constitutional interpretation represented by barristers represented by solicitors political communication rights |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_constitutional_law
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
constitutional law case
freedom of speech case affects future legislation affects judicial review standards electoral law case guides electoral reforms high court decision influences political campaign laws political rights case shapes public policy debates |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Gordon_J
Bell_J_and_Gageler_J French_CJ_and_Kiefel_J Keane_J_and_Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|