Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
McCloy
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 23)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Australian_electoral_law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J unanimous Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
validity of electoral laws |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Australian_Constitution
public policy judicial independence public interest judicial review separation of powers civil liberties freedom of assembly political participation rule of law election integrity government regulation government transparency voter rights election laws political accountability freedom of association transparency in elections constitutional interpretation political rights political ethics rights protection accountability in governance implied rights political communication rights regulation of political donations democratic_governance democratic_principles Section_24_of_the_Constitution Section_7_of_the_Constitution |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influential case
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
State of New South Wales
|
| gptkbp:significance |
freedom of speech
|