Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
S202/2014
constitutional challenge |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
political transparency
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
constitutional freedoms protection of political communication validity of restrictions |
| gptkbp:date |
July 1, 2015
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
implied rights
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
political advertising laws
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 22)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
political communication rights
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J freedom of expression unanimous legislative actions Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
regulation of political advertising |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
impact on electoral laws
appellant's counsel respondent's counsel |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Australian_Constitution
political discourse democratic_principles |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
freedom of speech
landmark ruling political rights future legislation political campaign regulations |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
upheld the law upheld constitutional validity |
| gptkbp:precedent |
freedom of political communication
in_Australian_law |
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
interpretation_of_the_Constitution
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
constitutional law
|