Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
M30/2015
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
2015-09-03
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 2)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on electoral integrity
on campaign financing on political donations |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J majority decision dissenting opinion Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of political communication
constitutionality of electoral funding laws |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
judicial independence
public interest government accountability checks and balances judicial review separation of powers rights of citizens political accountability transparency in elections constitutional interpretation electoral fairness political equality statutory interpretation campaign finance reform protection of democracy appellant represented by solicitors freedom from corruption regulation of political parties respondent represented by solicitors voter influence |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
freedom of speech
political communication rights democratic_principles Australian_constitutional_law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the validity of laws
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:McCloy_v._New_South_Wales
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2015-06-02
|