Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
from_New_South_Wales_Court_of_Appeal
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
M19/2014
|
| gptkbp:context |
Australian_electoral_system
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
2015-08-04
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
implied rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 19)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on political finance laws
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Gordon
gptkb:French_CJ gptkb:Gageler_J gptkb:Justice_Nettle majority decision Bell_J Kiefel_J Keane_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
constitutionality of laws
freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
constitutional law
administrative law public law human rights law election law appellant represented by solicitors respondent represented by solicitors |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
[2015] HCA 34
to campaign finance reform to electoral integrity to freedom of expression to political accountability to_Australian_democracy |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
upheld the law |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
political donations
election campaign regulations |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2015-05-06
|