Statements (36)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:area |
constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 14)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
federal election laws
state election laws political campaign financing political communication rights |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J majority decision dissenting opinion Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
freedom of expression
election integrity freedom of political communication regulation of political donations |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
appellant represented by solicitors
respondent represented by solicitors |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
[2015] HCA 34
addresses constitutional rights analyzes freedom of speech discusses electoral fairness examines state regulation involves political donations |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the validity of laws
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth gptkb:Unions_NSW_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|