|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
legal case
|
|
gptkbp:caseTypes
|
M30/2015
|
|
gptkbp:citedBy
|
[2015] HCA 34
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2015-07-08
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
2015
|
|
gptkbp:doctrine
|
implied rights
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v. McCloy (No 12)
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
political communication laws
|
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in
|
State of New South Wales
McCloy
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J
none
unanimous
Bell_J
Kiefel_J
Gordon_J
Keane_J
Nettle_J
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
proportionality test
freedom of political communication
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:Crown_Solicitor's_Office
McCloy’s_counsel
|
|
gptkbp:legalStatus
|
Australian_constitutional_law
|
|
gptkbp:notableFeature
|
public interest
judicial review
freedom of expression
constitutional interpretation
regulation of political advertising
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
upheld the law
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
in_Australian_law
|
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent
|
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
landmark case
|
|
gptkbp:soundtrack
|
2015-05-06
|