Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
M30/2015 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2015] HCA 34
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:date |
July 8, 2015
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2015
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
implied rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. McCloy (No 11)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
political communication rights
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of New South Wales
McCloy |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:French_CJ
gptkb:Gageler_J public interest freedom of expression unanimous regulation of political donations Bell_J Kiefel_J Gordon_J Keane_J Nettle_J |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
constitutionality of laws
freedom of political communication |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
constitutional interpretation
counsel_for_McCloy counsel_for_NSW |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Australian_constitutional_law
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
judicial review
landmark ruling political accountability legal precedent for future cases political campaign regulations transparency in politics constitutional rights protection election funding laws interpretation_of_the_Constitution democratic_principles |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the law
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
in_Australian_law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lange_v_Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation
gptkb:McCloy_v_New_South_Wales |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on electoral laws
|