R (on the application of B) v Secretary of State for Health
GPTKB entity
Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:area |
administrative law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
upheld rights overturned previous ruling |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2021
|
| gptkbp:discusses |
legal scholars
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (on the application of B) v Secretary of State for Health
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced legislation
healthcare_access |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
B
Secretary_of_State_for_Health |
| gptkbp:judges |
irrationality
unanimous February 2021 illegality procedural fairness challenged decision |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
public interest
right to appeal |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public interest lawyers
impact on regulations |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
COVID-19 pandemic
public health law |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:National_Health_Service_Act_2006
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
policy changes
judicial accountability landmark decision future healthcare policies shaped public policy important precedent discussed in legal forums important for legal precedents influenced future litigation [2021] UKSC 1 affecting future cases examined public interest reviewed by courts critical for healthcare access examined legality public health law reforms review of health policies healthcare_rights |
| gptkbp:outcome |
clarified legal standards
strengthened legal protections reaffirmed judicial oversight enhanced scrutiny judicial review granted remitted for reconsideration revised health policies revised judicial review standards |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influential case
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
R_(on_the_application_of_C)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Health
|
| gptkbp:significance |
healthcare_policy
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
January 2021
|