R (Miller) v. The Queen

GPTKB entity

Statements (49)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseTypes Public law
[2019] UKSC 41
gptkbp:community_engagement High public interest in parliamentary proceedings.
Widespread public support for the ruling.
gptkbp:court gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
gptkbp:date September 24, 2019
gptkbp:decidedBy 2020
gptkbp:discusses Frequently discussed in legal forums.
gptkbp:gameFeatures gptkb:Gina_Miller
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label R (Miller) v. The Queen
gptkbp:impact Increased scrutiny of government actions.
Influenced discussions on parliamentary sovereignty.
Reinforced the role of the judiciary.
Strengthened democratic accountability.
Influenced_public_opinion_on_Brexit.
gptkbp:influence Political ramifications for the Prime Minister.
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Lady_Hale
gptkb:Lord_Wilson
gptkb:Lord_Kerr
gptkb:Lord_Lloyd-Jones
gptkb:Lord_Hodge
gptkb:Lord_Reed
Judicial review of executive power.
Lord_Sales
The_court_ruled_on_the_legality_of_proroguing_Parliament.
gptkbp:legal_principle Parliamentary sovereignty is paramount.
Proroguing Parliament must be justified.
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:James_Eadie_QC
gptkb:David_Pannick_QC
gptkbp:legalStatus Constitutional law
Brexit negotiations.
gptkbp:media_coverage Extensive media coverage.
gptkbp:notableFeature Available in legal databases.
Analyzed in legal journals.
Implications for the separation of powers.
Relevant to constitutional law studies.
Set a standard for future executive actions.
[2020] UKSC 41
The_case_challenged_the_legality_of_the_Prime_Minister's_advice_to_prorogue_Parliament.
gptkbp:outcome Prorogation was deemed unlawful.
Set a precedent for future prorogation cases.
Reaffirmed the importance of parliamentary democracy.
The_Supreme_Court_ruled_unanimously.
gptkbp:precedent Miller_I
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Cherry_v._Advocate_General_for_Scotland
Miller_I
gptkbp:respondsTo The Queen
gptkbp:soundtrack September 17, 2019