R (Miller) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
GPTKB entity
Statements (21)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
January 24, 2017
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
gptkb:Gina_Miller
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (Miller) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced_subsequent_legal_challenges_related_to_Brexit.
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lady_Hale
gptkb:Lord_Wilson gptkb:Lord_Hughes gptkb:Lord_Neuberger gptkb:Lord_Carnwath gptkb:Lord_Reed The_court_ruled_that_the_government_could_not_trigger_Article_50_without_parliamentary_approval. |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional law
The case was based on the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. Miller_was_represented_by_a_team_of_barristers. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
The_government_was_required_to_seek_approval_from_Parliament_before_invoking_Article_50.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
The case set a precedent for parliamentary sovereignty.
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:R_(Miller)_v._Secretary_of_State_for_Exiting_the_European_Union_(No_2)
|
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_Exiting_the_European_Union
|
| gptkbp:significance |
It_was_a_landmark_case_regarding_the_Brexit_process.
|