People v. Sanders

GPTKB entity

Statements (62)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Illinois_Supreme_Court
gptkb:New_York_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:advocates_for insufficient evidence
gptkbp:case_types criminal appeal
defendant's appeal denied
appealed from trial court
E033123
involved drug possession
involved police search
involves constitutional rights.
gptkbp:court gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
gptkb:Michael_Sanders
People of the State of California
lack of probable cause
gptkbp:decided_by affirmed
gptkbp:doctrine exclusionary rule
gptkbp:effective_date April 30, 2003
gptkbp:exhibited_at physical evidence
gptkbp:historical_debate unlawful search
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label People v. Sanders
gptkbp:impact law enforcement practices
gptkbp:is_cited_in 112 Cal. App.4th 1002
2003 WL 21005999
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Hollenhorst
gptkbp:judicial_review search warrant requirements
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:California
gptkbp:legal_issue search and seizure
reasonable expectation of privacy
Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
California criminal law
gptkbp:legal_representation public defender
application of Fourth Amendment
gptkbp:notable_event gptkb:People_v._Johnson
gptkb:People_v._Smith
gptkbp:outcome upheld lower court's decision
important for legal scholars
important for civil liberties
search was lawful
search was reasonable
review of evidence presented
defendant's conviction upheld
clarification of legal standards
conviction affirmed
affects future legal interpretations
guidance for law enforcement
affects future search cases
totality of circumstances
California case law
review of police conduct
affects search and seizure law
based on legal precedent
defendant's rights considered
majority opinion upheld search
search justified
gptkbp:precedent important for future cases
Fourth Amendment rights
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:none
Justice Hollenhorst's opinion
gptkbp:significance influences search warrant standards
gptkbp:year gptkb:2003