People v. Rinehart II

GPTKB entity

Statements (64)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:bfsLayer 6
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:People_v._Rinehart
gptkbp:advocates_for filed by defendant
gptkbp:case_types criminal appeal
S223210
gptkbp:consequences sentencing reform
gptkbp:court gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:2016
gptkbp:effective_date March 2016
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label People v. Rinehart II
gptkbp:impact California criminal justice system
gptkbp:is_cited_in 245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1
370 P.3d 1
gptkbp:is_involved_in gptkb:Robert_Rinehart
People of the State of California
gptkbp:judges Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:California
gptkbp:legal_issue gptkb:California_Penal_Code
gptkb:double_jeopardy
criminal law
fair trial
due process
gptkbp:legal_representation public defender
impact on future cases
gptkbp:material involved media coverage
involved legal arguments
involved expert testimonies
involved constitutional rights
involved public interest
involved appeal process
involved judicial review
involved legal ethics
involved legal precedents
involved legal standards
involved witness testimonies
involved evidence presentation
involved legislative changes
involved appellate review
involved public policy
involved law enforcement practices
involved community response
involved assault charges
involved forensic evidence
involved robbery charges
involved sentencing guidelines
involved sentencing hearing
involved jury deliberation
involved psychological evaluations
involved community safety
involved multiple victims
involved plea deal negotiations
involved victim impact statements
involved victim rights.
gptkbp:notable_event People v. Rinehart I
gptkbp:outcome conviction upheld
upheld conviction
affirmed lower court's decision
clarified sentencing laws
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:School_District
People v. Rinehart III
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:Justice_Ming_W._Chin
Justice Goodwin Liu
gptkbp:significance impact on sentencing guidelines