|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
from conviction
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
consent to search
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
appealed from trial court
B290123
involves drug possession charges.
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
affirmed lower court's ruling
published opinion
upheld by higher court
majority opinion written by Justice Smith
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
important for civil liberties
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
gptkb:crime
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
affects police procedures
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Jorge_Lopez
gptkb:Los_Angeles_County
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
People of the State of California
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
unanimous
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:none
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
April 30, 2019
|
|
gptkbp:eye_color
|
oral argument
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
People v. Lopez
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
law enforcement practices
future cases
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
32 Cal. App.5th 1001
|
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by
|
reasonable expectation of privacy
|
|
gptkbp:issues
|
warrantless search
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
Justices of the Court of Appeal
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:California_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
search and seizure
exigent circumstances
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
upheld conviction
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
exclusionary rule
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
public defender
search incident to arrest
|
|
gptkbp:notable_for
|
appellant's brief
respondent's brief
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
affirmed
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
gptkb:People_v._Mc_Gaughran
influences future rulings
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
Justice John Doe
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:People_v._Johnson
gptkb:People_v._Smith
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Fourth Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
drugs found
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2019
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Blakely_v._Washington
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|