Statements (27)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Illinois_Supreme_Court
gptkb:New_York_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
defendant's appeal
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
gptkb:Robert_Hill People of the State of California |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
affirmed conviction
|
| gptkbp:exhibited_at |
drugs found
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
unlawful search
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Hill
|
| gptkbp:impact |
California criminal law
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2002 WL 31415699
99 Cal. App.4th 1008 |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Hollenhorst
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
search and seizure
reasonable expectation of privacy |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
search was lawful
upheld evidence |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:People_v._Mc_Gaughran
Fourth Amendment rights |
| gptkbp:significance |
interpretation of search laws
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2002
|