|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
defendant's appeal
misconduct during trial
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
appealed from trial court
B206123
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
upheld conviction
affirmative ruling
evidence was admissible
future criminal cases
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
criminal procedure
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
criminal appeal
|
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
guilty verdict
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
affects future cases
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Cummings
gptkb:Los_Angeles_County_Superior_Court
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
not guilty
People of the State of California
insufficient evidence
ineffective assistance of counsel
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2009
|
|
gptkbp:defendant's_rights
|
protected under law
|
|
gptkbp:defendant's_sentence
|
imprisonment
|
|
gptkbp:doctrine
|
presumption of innocence
|
|
gptkbp:has_authority_over
|
review lower court decisions
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
People v. Cummings
|
|
gptkbp:involved
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
gptkb:People_v._Cummings,_2009
2009 WL 2151774
|
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by
|
harmless error
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
affirmed
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
appellate review
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
California legal system
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
due process
|
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
sentence upheld
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
evidence admission
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
public defender
appellate court analysis
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
conviction upheld
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
California case law
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
testimonial evidence
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Justice_Roger_J._Traynor
gptkb:People_v._Ramos
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|