Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
insufficient evidence
defendant's appeal trial errors |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal conviction
appellate case B202123 |
| gptkbp:chargingTime |
assault
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2009 WL 1035093
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
gptkb:Michael_Cummings District Attorney self-defense not guilty fair trial majority opinion evidence evaluation affirmative ruling affirmed lower court misconduct by prosecutor |
| gptkbp:date |
April 15, 2009
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2009
|
| gptkbp:duration |
several months
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
trial court proceedings
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Cummings
|
| gptkbp:impact |
California_criminal_procedure
|
| gptkbp:involved |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
none
appellate review three judges |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
jury instructions |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
public defense evidence sufficiency |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
beyond a reasonable doubt California_law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
court records
legal scholars criminal justice system criminal appeals legal precedent future legal interpretations criminal appeal case interpretation of evidence 2009 Cal.App. Unpub. LEXIS 3070 California_case_law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
upheld conviction affirmed conviction |
| gptkbp:precedent |
future cases
California_case_law |
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
appellate jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:research |
testimony
|