Properties (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Legal precedent for future cases
Affirmed lower court ruling Influenced law enforcement practices Reinforced police authority Clarified reasonable suspicion standards. |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law case
12-9498 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
134 S. Ct. 1683
|
| gptkbp:date |
January 14, 2014
April 22, 2014 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 22, 2014 |
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Appealed_from_California_Court_of_Appeal
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Navarette v. California
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced police stop procedures
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:Navarette_family
gptkb:California_Highway_Patrol |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Scalia
Majority opinion supported by four justices Dissent focused on privacy rights |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
gptkb:California_Highway_Patrol
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analyzed reasonable suspicion
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Reasonable suspicion standard
Traffic stop law Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Available in legal databases
Examined by legal scholars Influenced public policy debates Discussed in legal forums Cited in subsequent cases Established precedent on reasonable suspicion Relevant to civil liberties discussions Summary available in legal reviews Documented_in_Supreme_Court_records Critiqued_in_law_journals Significant_for_Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court upheld the stop
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent reasonable suspicion cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Fourth_Amendment_interpretation
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Illinois_v._Gates Stop and frisk Implications for police conduct |
| gptkbp:research |
Anonymous tip
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|