NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation
GPTKB entity
Statements (85)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
gptkb:legal_case |
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed in legal studies
studied in law schools |
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
originated from a labor dispute |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
strengthened labor unions influenced future labor legislation significant for labor rights shaped future labor policies affirmed the right to unionize led to the establishment of labor rights protections limited states' rights in labor disputes recognized workers' rights to organize influenced the development of labor law in the U. S. established federal jurisdiction over labor disputes affirmed NLRB's authority affirmed the NLRB's authority affirmed the NLRB's decisions affirmed the NLRB's role in labor disputes contributed to labor rights advancements established a framework for labor relations influenced labor policy debates influenced labor relations legislation influenced labor union growth majority opinion by Justice Hugo Black majority opinion emphasized economic necessity recognized the NLRB's role in labor disputes recognized the importance of collective bargaining set a precedent for future labor cases set precedent for collective bargaining rights set the stage for future labor rights cases shaped labor relations in the United States significant for labor law evolution strengthened federal labor regulations upheld the right to collective bargaining led to increased federal oversight of labor relations upheld the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively recognized the federal government's role in labor relations |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark decision in labor law
critical for labor rights advocacy |
| gptkbp:case_types |
administrative law case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Sutherland gptkb:Justice_Butler gptkb:Justice_Mc_Reynolds dissent by Justice James Clark Mc Reynolds |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
April 12, 1937
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Great_Depression
gptkb:New_Deal_legislation Great Depression era labor disputes |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation
|
| gptkbp:impact |
expanded federal power over labor relations
influenced labor relations policy |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Board
gptkb:Jones_&_Laughlin_Steel_Corporation |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
often cited in labor law discussions
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
reviewed by the Supreme Court
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
upheld the right to unionize
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
focused on economic impact of labor relations
whether the NLRB had jurisdiction over labor relations |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
upheld workers' rights to organize
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
interstate commerce clause
commerce clause interpretation federalism in labor law |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Act
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruled in favor of the NLRB
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established federal oversight of labor relations
federal regulation of labor relations subsequent labor law cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Stone
gptkb:Justice_Murphy gptkb:Justice_Jackson gptkb:Justice_Frankfurter gptkb:Justice_Hughes |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Wagner Act cases
labor law enforcement cases |
| gptkbp:significance |
upheld the National Labor Relations Act
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:US_Supreme_Court
gptkb:Justice_Mc_Reynolds |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|