Murphy v. Waterfront Commission
GPTKB entity
Properties (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 63
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Summary of the court's decision
Affected labor relations policies Detailed analysis of state and federal powers Expanded protections for workers Impact on labor law and civil rights |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law case
No. 63 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
378 U.S. 52
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
Majority favored federal jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:date |
June 24, 1964
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 24, 1964 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
April 21, 1964
Lawyers for Murphy Lawyers for Waterfront Commission |
| gptkbp:hasPriorityDate |
Still relevant in current labor discussions
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Frequently cited in legal literature
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement_era
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Part of a series of labor law cases
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Murphy v. Waterfront Commission
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced labor law and state regulation
|
| gptkbp:involved |
Murphy_and_Waterfront_Commission
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan_II
Constitutional review Affirmed lower court's ruling Majority opinion favored individual rights Dissent focused on state authority Influenced_future_Supreme_Court_decisions Supreme_Court_review_of_state_actions |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined balance of power
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Set precedent for future cases
Addressed state versus federal authority Constitutional framework for labor rights Reinforced federal oversight Interstate_Commerce_Clause |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Influenced labor-related legislation
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Used in law schools for teaching
Analysis of majority and dissenting opinions Important for labor law history Significant in labor rights discussions Summary of legal arguments presented |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_in_favor_of_Murphy
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent labor relations cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions from labor groups
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Wieman_v._Updegraff
Due Process Clause Broader implications for civil rights |