Statements (123)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
gptkb:battle
dismissed |
| gptkbp:area |
tort law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
appealed from lower court tort case [1976] 1 All ER 256 landowner rights vs. recreational use reported in law journals dispute over cricket ground involved cricket club shaped nuisance doctrine. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
shaped nuisance law interpretation
impact on sports facilities |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:England
gptkb:Jackson gptkb:Miller gptkb:legal_case civil court public policy considerations |
| gptkbp:damage |
compensation to Miller
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:1977
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
reasonable use
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1977-05-10
1977-05-12 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Miller v. Jackson
|
| gptkbp:impact |
property rights
influenced future nuisance cases |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
frequently referenced
[1977] 1 WLR 1032 [1977] 1 WLR 1032, [1976] 1 All ER 256 [1977] 1 WLR 1001 |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Jackson
gptkb:Miller |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Geoffrey_Lane
gptkb:Lord_Justice_Scarman gptkb:Lord_Justice_Bridge |
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
gptkb:majority_opinion
dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
affects community planning
considered reasonable use of land |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:England
gptkb:United_Kingdom |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:metropolitan_area
nuisance examined ethical considerations analyzed judicial reasoning tortious liability discussed implications for future cases emphasized property rights considered historical precedents addressed public nuisance issues analyzed environmental considerations assessed long-term impacts on communities assessed social implications considered community benefits considered land use planning issues considered local government regulations debated community rights vs. individual rights debated fairness of outcomes debated recreational activities' impact discussed economic implications discussed implications for urban planning. discussed reasonable use of land evaluated community standards examined historical context of nuisance law examined judicial discretion increased urban development public interest vs. private rights reasonable use of property reviewed public policy considerations reviewed statutory regulations disruption from cricket balls |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
solicitors
examined public interest Jackson's solicitor Miller's solicitor |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:England
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Rylands_v._Fletcher
gptkb:Sturges_v._Bridgman |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion
property law tort law affirmed lower court ruling injunction granted damages awarded reviewed by legal scholars affirmed lower court's ruling used in law schools influenced local governance land use regulation established precedent influenced local government policies upheld nuisance claim balancing interests favor of Miller modern nuisance law landowner rights upheld upheld property rights compensation for loss of enjoyment established nuisance law principles examined balancing of interests modern property disputes set standards for future nuisance claims upheld the right to enjoy one's property affects future land disputes decision in favor of Miller influences local ordinances landowner protections nuisance established |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:battle
influence on future cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
minority opinion
|
| gptkbp:significance |
land use and nuisance law
land use and property rights |
| gptkbp:use_case |
still cited in legal arguments
important in nuisance law |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:1977
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Alfred_Thompson_Denning
gptkb:Lord_Atkin gptkb:Baron_Denning |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|