Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
1:20-cv-00477
|
| gptkbp:challenges |
to executive orders
|
| gptkbp:claims |
overreach of power
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
protests against restrictions
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Michigan
balance of rights and safety upheld some restrictions |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:electionYear |
influenced voter sentiment
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
April 2020
|
| gptkbp:healthcare |
debate over public health vs. individual rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Michigan v. Whitmer
|
| gptkbp:ideology |
shaped public discourse on governance
|
| gptkbp:impact |
debate on civil liberties during emergencies
influenced other states' COVID-19 policies long-term impact on state laws |
| gptkbp:influence |
for state emergency declarations
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Governor_Gretchen_Whitmer
Michigan_residents |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Paul_Maloney
notable dissenting opinions review of executive orders |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
COVID-19 restrictions
Fourteenth Amendment rights theories of constitutional law First_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
analyzed by legal scholars private law firms |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
context of pandemic response
framework for evaluating executive power |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Michigan_Emergency_Management_Act
Public Health Code new laws passed post-decision |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive national media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
highlighted state-federal tensions
2020 WL 1234567 used as case study in law schools implications for state governance for future emergencies |
| gptkbp:outcome |
October 2020
analyzed by legal experts court ruled against the governor's restrictions mixed outcome |
| gptkbp:policy |
public health policies
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
state vs. federal authority
for future cases regarding executive power |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
divided public opinion
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Gretchen_Whitmer
protest leaders |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Whitmer_v._Reilly
Tenth Amendment Ninth Amendment |
| gptkbp:significance |
set precedent for state emergency powers
|
| gptkbp:state |
revised emergency powers
|
| gptkbp:unitAwards |
public safety
|