Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law case
09-150 |
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
March 21, 2011 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
November 2, 2010
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Michigan v. Bryant
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Hearsay rules
Law_enforcement_practices |
| gptkbp:involves |
hearsay evidence
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Criminal law
Clarified the 'primary purpose' test for determining hearsay exceptions |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
562 U.S. 344
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Affirmed the use of statements made to police in emergency situations
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Emergency exception to hearsay rule
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Davis_v._Washington
gptkb:Crawford_v._Washington |
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Michigan
|