Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
revised planning laws
upheld the appeal |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
S195/2014 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Sydney,_Australia
seven justices |
| gptkbp:date |
2015-08-06
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
McCloy
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
McCloy v. New South Wales
|
| gptkbp:impact |
planning_laws_in_Australia
|
| gptkbp:judges |
none
yes unanimous decision |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Australian_Constitution
administrative law proportionality test barristers and solicitors validity of planning laws affecting local councils New_South_Wales_planning_legislation |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
court transcripts
environmental law judicial scrutiny legal briefs legal commentaries [2015] HCA 34 urban development regulations constitutional law implications judgment summaries land use planning principles law journal articles |
| gptkbp:outcome |
decision in favor of the appellant
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Gordon
gptkb:Justice_Hayne gptkb:Justice_Gageler gptkb:Justice_Nettle gptkb:Justice_Bell gptkb:Justice_Keane gptkb:Justice_Kiefel |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influence on future cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
yes
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Petersen_v._New_South_Wales
|
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:New_South_Wales
|
| gptkbp:significance |
land use regulation
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2015-05-06
|
| gptkbp:year |
2015
|