Statements (73)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
insufficient evidence
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
important for legal scholars.
used in law schools. analyzed for legal principles. analyzed for legal implications. |
| gptkbp:case_number |
appealed from lower court.
available in legal databases. CUM-09-1234 Hodge appealed his conviction. involves criminal law issues. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
upheld lower court ruling
affects future criminal appeals. affects legal standards. conviction affirmed. conviction upheld by majority. decision published in Maine Reports. evidence was sufficient. majority opinion supports conviction. majority opinion written by Justice Doe. upheld conviction on appeal. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for appeals
important for legal precedents. significant for criminal law. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
sets precedent for similar cases.
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Augusta,_Maine
5 justices |
| gptkbp:court_decision_summary |
decision summarized in legal reviews.
|
| gptkbp:court_procedure |
oral arguments heard.
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2010
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
Supreme Court of Maine
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:none
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
2010-1234
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
April 20, 2010
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Maine v. Hodge
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal procedure
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_Maine
Hodge |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
cited in legal arguments.
2010 ME 45 2010 ME 45, 997 A.2d 1234 |
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
beyond a reasonable doubt
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:majority_opinion
reviewed by Supreme Court. reviewed by higher court. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Maine
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Maine criminal law
contextualized within Maine law. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Maine Revised Statutes.
examined under Maine statutes. influences future rulings. upheld by Supreme Court. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
criminal law
insufficient evidence presented. |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
conviction upheld
conviction affirmed by court. upheld by judicial review. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
analyzed for evidentiary standards. examined evidence presented. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:State_v._Smith
established legal principles influences future cases. establishes important legal standards. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
4-1
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Maine v. Johnson
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarifies standards of evidence.
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2010
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Maine_Supreme_Judicial_Court
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|