Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
United Kingdom law
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
gptkb:Sir_William_Jowitt
gptkb:Sir_John_Anderson analyzed in legal journals discussed in legal textbooks examined in constitutional law courses studied in law schools |
| gptkbp:case_number |
[1941] 2 All E. R. 245
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
set a precedent for future cases
influenced public policy debates examined in political science studies influenced international human rights law controversial among legal scholars upheld executive discretion highlighted tensions between security and liberty debated in human rights forums influenced public opinion on government power remains a point of contention in legal circles shaped future legislation on detention |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark case in UK law
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
administrative law case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
raised questions about due process
shaped future human rights discussions |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:1942
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
Lord Atkin's dissent
|
| gptkbp:government |
internment of suspected enemy aliens
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
post-war legal reforms
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Liversidge v. Anderson
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
[1942] A. C. 206
often referenced in legal literature |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Thankerton
gptkb:Lord_Macmillan gptkb:Lord_Atkin gptkb:Lord_Wright gptkb:Lord_Porter |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
limited scope of judicial review
|
| gptkbp:key_issues |
detention without trial
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:World_War_II_Britain
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
framework for emergency powers
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
debate on national security vs. civil rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
controversial decision
affirmed broad executive powers |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
principle of legality
|
| gptkbp:legal_relevance |
still cited in legal arguments
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
examined executive power limits
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the legality of detention
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases on detention
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:R_v._Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department
gptkb:A_v._Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on civil liberties
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Lord_Atkin
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|