Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
interlocutory appeal
error in law |
| gptkbp:artistic_influence |
influenced artist rights
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
implications for artistic expression
implications for derivative works implications for digital media implications for fair use policy implications for future copyright cases implications for licensing agreements implications for public domain |
| gptkbp:case_number |
summary of legal arguments
99-1234 summary of judicial reasoning |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
monetary damages awarded
ruling against Hurd ruling in favor of Leonard |
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
| gptkbp:damages_amount |
gptkb:$100,000
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:1999
|
| gptkbp:docket_number |
Docket No. 99-1234
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
doctrine of estoppel
doctrine of laches |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
March 10, 1999
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Leonard vs. Hurd II
|
| gptkbp:impact |
copyright reform discussions
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_creators |
affected creator compensation
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Leonard
gptkb:Hurd |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
123 F.3d 456
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith Judge Johnson |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:intellectual_property
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
fair use
transformative use |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
law firm A
law firm B analysis of copyright infringement analysis of fair use doctrine |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Copyright_Act_of_1976
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
appeal upheld
case affirmed lower court ruling |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc.
influential in copyright law |
| gptkbp:publication_year |
January 15, 1998
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Leonard_v._Hurd_I
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on future cases
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sugar_Ray_Leonard
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|