Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:area |
criminal law
constitutional law |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
B 18 of 1998
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
1999 HCA 8
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1999
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
principle of legality
doctrine of legality |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Kable v. DPP (No 2)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
on state laws
on federal laws |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Kable
Director_of_Public_Prosecutions_(DPP) |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Gleeson
gptkb:Justice_Callinan gptkb:Justice_Kirby gptkb:Justice_Hayne gptkb:Justice_McHugh unanimous Justice Gummow February 10, 1999 |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
judicial independence
separation of powers legislative power detention without trial |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
DPP's_lawyer
Kable's_lawyer |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Crimes Act 1914
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
government accountability
judicial review civil liberties rule of law protection of individual rights landmark decision constitutional challenge |
| gptkbp:outcome |
invalidated legislation
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
in future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Kable_v._DPP_(No_3)
gptkb:Kable_v._DPP_(No_1) |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact_on_Australian_law
|