Jones v. United States

GPTKB entity

Statements (52)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:applicationNumber 10-1259
gptkbp:caseTypes 10-1259
gptkbp:citedBy 132 S. Ct. 945
gptkbp:community_engagement significant media coverage
gptkbp:consequences law_enforcement_practices
gptkbp:controversy November 8, 2011
warrantless surveillance
gptkbp:court gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
reaffirmed individual rights
examines technological advancements
interprets constitutional rights
redefined expectations of privacy.
expanded_Fourth_Amendment_protections
gptkbp:date January 23, 2012
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
2012
gptkbp:historical_analysis extensive legal commentary
gptkbp:homeGround involves_Antoine_Jones
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Jones v. United States
gptkbp:impact privacy rights in digital age
influences law enforcement policies
gptkbp:judges none
constitutional interpretation
reversed lower court ruling
bipartisan support for privacy rights
gptkbp:legal_principle reasonable expectation of privacy
Fourth_Amendment_rights
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:David_C._Frederick
gptkbp:legalStatus affirms privacy rights
Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence
Fourth_Amendment_protections
gptkbp:legislation Electronic Communications Privacy Act
gptkbp:notableFeature important for civil liberties
important for constitutional law
affects future surveillance technology
affects surveillance laws
examines government surveillance practices
involves drug trafficking investigation
landmark in privacy law
involves_GPS_tracking_without_warrant
gptkbp:outcome GPS tracking without warrant unconstitutional
set precedent for digital privacy
strengthens_Fourth_Amendment_protections
gptkbp:politicalParty unanimous
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:United_States_v._Katz
guides future cases on privacy
warrant requirement for GPS tracking
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
influenced future rulings
gptkbp:significance landmark decision
gptkbp:soundtrack November 8, 2011