Statements (107)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Application No. 30542/04
Application No. 30562/04 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Jamaica's legal obligations
UK's legal obligations overturned death sentences |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
landmark ruling
impact on international human rights law impact on death penalty debates precedent for future human rights cases |
| gptkbp:consequences |
affecting future cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:European_Court_of_Human_Rights
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:European_Court_of_Human_Rights
judgment on death penalty |
| gptkbp:discusses |
gptkb:legal_reforms
gptkb:government_policies gptkb:social_justice public policy judicial independence government accountability constitutional law prison conditions fair trial rights legal accountability legal standards inhumane treatment treaty obligations legal implications government reforms |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
judges' differing views
|
| gptkbp:final_decision_date |
2006-04-07
|
| gptkbp:government_response |
policy changes in Jamaica
policy changes in the UK |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Jamaica v. United Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Jamaican judicial system
UK judicial system |
| gptkbp:impact_on_jamaica |
reform of death penalty laws
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:public_opinion
gptkb:historical_context gptkb:international_treaties political climate legal precedents international pressure |
| gptkbp:international_relations |
gptkb:European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
|
| gptkbp:international_response |
reaction from human rights organizations
reaction from legal scholars |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:activists
gptkb:human_rights_organizations gptkb:legal_frameworks gptkb:Jamaica gptkb:United_Kingdom gptkb:international_law judicial review legal challenges legal scholars legal advocacy judicial decisions death row inmates judicial activism legal institutions legal representation issues judicial review processes legal reforms proposals |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:[2006]_ECHR_1
subsequent cases |
| gptkbp:judged_by |
final judgment
influenced Caribbean legal systems influenced Commonwealth countries 7 February 2006 |
| gptkbp:judges |
European Court judges
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
post-colonial legal issues
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
death penalty
human rights violations |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
prohibition of inhuman treatment
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Jamaican_government
gptkb:British_government critique of death penalty evaluation of human rights compliance |
| gptkbp:notable_interview |
gptkb:Jamaica
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
violation of human rights
death penalty deemed inhumane |
| gptkbp:precedent |
in international law
influenced other cases |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
debate on capital punishment
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Pratt_and_Morgan_v._Attorney_General_for_Jamaica
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
gptkb:Jamaican_Constitution gptkb:international_relations civil rights UK law human rights violations law enforcement practices international human rights law human rights law legal ethics judicial processes international law standards capital punishment debates Jamaican law |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
discussions in legal journals
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on capital punishment laws
|
| gptkbp:social_issues |
prohibition of torture
right to life prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment |
| gptkbp:sound |
gptkb:2005
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2006
|