In re Marriage of Candelaria
GPTKB entity
Statements (57)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:appeal |
spousal support decision
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber |
Docket No. 123456
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
B067123
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
B067123
Candelaria_v._Candelaria,_1994 |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
published opinion unpublished opinion affirmed custody arrangement denied spousal support modification |
gptkbp:date |
April 12, 1994
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
In re Marriage of Candelaria
|
gptkbp:impact |
California_family_law
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Candelaria
Candelaria's_spouse |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
child custody
child support guidelines spousal support best interests of the child equitable distribution marital property division |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Candelaria's_attorney
Candelaria's_spouse's_attorney |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark case
impact on future cases summary of legal arguments summary of legal findings summary of dissenting opinions summary of majority opinions summary of judicial reasoning summary of factual background summary of legal context summary of procedural history interpretation of family law precedent for custody disputes precedent for support disputes summary of appellate review summary of child custody standards summary of court decisions summary of equitable distribution standards summary of family law principles summary of implications for future cases summary of legal implications summary of legal precedents summary of spousal support standards |
gptkbp:outcome |
established case law
clarified legal standards modification of custody reaffirmed custody rights revised support obligations |
gptkbp:precedent |
family law
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:In_re_Marriage_of_Johnson
In re Marriage of Smith |
gptkbp:year |
1994
|