Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:State_of_Washington_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
00-1006 part of a series of land use cases |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 24, 2001 |
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
state-federal relations
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
November 27, 2000
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
important case in land law
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Idaho v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
state sovereignty issues
|
| gptkbp:involves |
federal land management
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
subsequent legal cases
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:United_States_government
gptkb:State_of_Idaho |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
subject to judicial review
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
United States federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:government_agency
land rights disputes land use rights focused on federal authority focused on state rights part of federal land use framework principles of federalism applied |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:U._S._Solicitor_General
Idaho Attorney General |
| gptkbp:legislation |
influenced federal land management laws
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:United_States_v._California
United States v. New Mexico |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court ruling
significant for environmental law analyzed in legal textbooks upheld federal regulations Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States affects state land use policies influenced state-federal land negotiations land management authority upheld land use regulations affirmed majority opinion authored by Justice O' Connor reaffirmed federal supremacy in land use significant for future land disputes |
| gptkbp:precedent |
federal land use policy
established precedent for federal authority |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
mixed reactions from states
dissent by Justice Thomas |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
widely studied in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified state versus federal authority over land
|
| gptkbp:voting_method |
5-4
|