Statements (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:affiliatedWith |
gptkb:Lambda_Legal
gptkb:Equality_California Human Rights Campaign |
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
12-144
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
family law
civil rights constitutional law |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
570 U.S. 693 (2013)
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
controversial among conservative groups
widely_celebrated_by_LGBTQ_advocates |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 26, 2013
June 26, 2013 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2013
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
part_of_a_series_of_legal_battles_for_LGBTQ_rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hollingsworth v. State
|
| gptkbp:impact |
set a precedent for future LGBTQ rights cases
led_to_legalization_of_same-sex_marriage_in_California California's_same-sex_marriage_laws |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of California
Hollingsworth |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito Justice Clarence Thomas reviewed_by_the_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
same-sex marriage
due process equal protection under the law standing to sue |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:The_American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:California_Proposition_8
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Proposition 8 was found unconstitutional
court_ruled_on_the_constitutionality_of_Proposition_8 |
| gptkbp:policy |
encouraged other states to legalize same-sex marriage
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future same-sex marriage cases
states cannot deny marriage to same-sex couples |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
shifted towards support for same-sex marriage
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
gptkb:United_States_v._Windsor |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark_case_for_LGBTQ_rights
|