gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
13-354
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
First Supreme Court case addressing religious rights of corporations.
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:date
|
March 25, 2014
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
5-4 decision
June 30, 2014
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Employer health insurance mandates
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
Sebelius
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
573 U. S. 682
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
Federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
Exemption from providing certain contraceptives
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
Corporate personhood
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act_of_1993
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Hobby Lobby's religious rights were upheld
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Impact on contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|