Statements (63)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:argued_on |
November 10, 1992
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
Frequently referenced in legal discussions.
Continues to be cited in legal arguments. Focused on the attorney's advice regarding plea deals. |
gptkbp:case_number |
Involved a claim of ineffective assistance during plea negotiations.
Appealed from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Involved a plea bargain. No. 91-7374 Significant in the evolution of legal standards. Examined the implications of ineffective assistance. Addressed the consequences of ineffective legal representation. |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
Reversed and remanded.
Reaffirmed the importance of effective legal counsel. Determined the standard for evaluating attorney performance. Influenced the rights of defendants. Shaped the landscape of criminal defense. Clarified the legal standards for ineffective assistance. Reaffirmed the importance of effective legal representation. Clarified the legal standards for evaluating claims. Established a clearer standard for ineffective assistance. Reinforced the necessity of competent legal advice. |
gptkbp:case_significance |
Influenced the interpretation of the Sixth Amendment.
|
gptkbp:case_types |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:court |
Supreme Court of the United States.
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 24, 1993 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
gptkbp:docket_number |
91-7374
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for |
Impact on criminal defense practices.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hill v. Lockhart
|
gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future cases on ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
507 U. S. 251
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
Strickland standard.
Two-pronged test established in Strickland. |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_court_system
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
Plea bargaining process.
Post-conviction relief. |
gptkbp:legal_framework |
Constitutional law.
Constitutional rights. |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
Ineffective assistance of counsel
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Reaffirmed the necessity of competent legal counsel.
Determined the adequacy of legal representation. Highlighted the importance of informed consent in plea agreements. |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
Right to a fair trial.
Two-pronged test for ineffective assistance. Right to effective assistance of counsel. |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined the effectiveness of counsel's performance.
|
gptkbp:legislation |
Due process.
|
gptkbp:outcome |
Court ruled on the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel claims.
|
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
Set a benchmark for evaluating attorney performance. Established guidelines for future ineffective assistance claims. |
gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:James_Hill
Larry Lockhart |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
Culombe v. Connecticut. |
gptkbp:significance |
Established a framework for assessing attorney effectiveness.
Clarified the burden of proof in ineffective assistance claims. Set a standard for evaluating claims of ineffective assistance. |
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Strickland_v._Washington
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|