Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:appellees |
gptkb:New_York_State
|
| gptkbp:case_filing_date |
gptkb:2004
|
| gptkbp:case_impact_on_society |
shifted views on marriage rights
|
| gptkbp:case_judicial_panel_composition |
seven judges with varying opinions
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
2004-2006
part of a series of same-sex marriage cases |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
influenced other states' marriage laws
majority opinion against same-sex marriage not favorable for plaintiffs |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
highlighted legal inequalities
important in LGBTQ legal history |
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil rights case
traditional marriage definition |
| gptkbp:court |
state supreme court
same-sex couples New York State officials |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:New_York_Court_of_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Judge_Robert_Smith
|
| gptkbp:economic_policy |
debate on marriage equality
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
July 6, 2006
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
paved the way for future legal battles
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hernandez v. Robles
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced public opinion on same-sex marriage
|
| gptkbp:is_a_basis_for |
state constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
7 N. Y.3d 338 (2006)
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
affirmed lower court's ruling
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judges_Ciparick_and_Graffeo
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
constitutional challenge
reviewed by New York Court of Appeals upheld existing marriage laws |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
New York marriage law
context of marriage equality debates in the U. S. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
state versus federal marriage laws
seven judges not a constitutional right at the time |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:same-sex_marriage
equal protection clause discrimination against same-sex couples challenged New York's marriage laws |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
reaffirmed traditional marriage definition
not a victory for marriage equality advocates influenced public policy discussions on marriage rights. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:New_York_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:Lambda_Legal |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Marriage Equality Act in New York
|
| gptkbp:material |
filed by same-sex couples in New York
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the state's ban on same-sex marriage
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future rulings
subsequent same-sex marriage cases |
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:David_Hernandez
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Judge_Judith_Kaye
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
mixed reactions
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
|
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case in LGBTQ rights
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Lambda_Legal
gptkb:Lambda_Legal_Defense_and_Education_Fund |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|