Statements (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
legal reforms
legal interpretations judicial interpretation precedent cases subsequent rulings reversal of lower court decision legal outcomes court applications reversal details |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 1
civil case court opinions legal discussions |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
218 U.S. 442
|
| gptkbp:court |
legal journals
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
April 15, 1907 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
January 14, 1907
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
gptkb:post-Civil_War_America
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Harlan v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
federal court procedures
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
Harlan |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_McKenna
gptkb:Justice_Brewer gptkb:Justice_Harlan gptkb:Justice_Holmes gptkb:Justice_White gptkb:Justice_Peckham majority opinion Justice Day |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
due process
federal jurisdiction early 20th century law interpretation of federal law reaffirmation of federal authority |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
court records
case law analysis constitutional law law students legal scholars legal textbooks judicial decisions legal forums case analysis law reviews significant case legal summaries influenced future federal cases legal_critiques |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark
federalism historical context legal implications |
| gptkbp:team |
legal precedent
|