Harlan v. California

GPTKB entity

Statements (53)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseOutcome summarized in legal databases
discussed in law reviews
studied in academic settings
influenced future legal standards
upheld by higher court
conviction affirmed despite challenges
evidence obtained illegally
shaped search and seizure laws
gptkbp:caseTypes criminal case
analyzed in legal journals
S.F. No. 20200
gptkbp:citedBy 58 Cal. 2d 1
gptkbp:court March 26, 1962
state_supreme_court
gptkbp:criticism concerns over privacy rights
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_California
gptkbp:firstClaim influenced law enforcement practices
gptkbp:historicalEvent appealed from lower court
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Harlan v. California
gptkbp:impact influenced future rulings on search warrants
gptkbp:involved State of California
Harlan
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Traynor
majority opinion favored state
upheld lower court's decision
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:California
gptkbp:legal_representation examined constitutional rights
gptkbp:legalStatus defense attorney
criminal procedure
conviction upheld
set precedent for future cases
impact on privacy rights
Fourth_Amendment_rights
Fourth_Amendment_violations
gptkbp:notableFeature available in legal archives
reviewed by legal scholars
established standards for evidence
available in court records
involved illegal search
often studied in law schools
cited in legal literature
important in criminal law
influenced public perception of police conduct
gptkbp:outcome affirmed conviction
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Peters
gptkbp:precedent search and seizure laws
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
exclusionary rule
implications for law enforcement
part of broader legal trends
gptkbp:team remains significant in legal discussions
gptkbp:year 1962