|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:political_negotiations
|
|
gptkbp:consists_of
|
five separate bills
|
|
gptkbp:contributed_to
|
political realignment
|
|
gptkbp:depicted_in
|
temporary solution
|
|
gptkbp:enacted_by
|
September 18, 1850
|
|
gptkbp:established
|
Texas's debt assumption
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
Antebellum America
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Great Compromise of 1850
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
increased tensions over slavery
|
|
gptkbp:included
|
New Mexico and Utah territories
|
|
gptkbp:influenced
|
gptkb:Dred_Scott_decision
gptkb:American_Civil_War
Civil War tensions
public opinion on slavery
|
|
gptkbp:inspired
|
gptkb:Kansas-Nebraska_Act
|
|
gptkbp:involved
|
gptkb:Daniel_Webster
gptkb:John_C._Calhoun
gptkb:Henry_Clay
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_moment_of
|
U. S. legislative history
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_solution_for
|
disputes between free and slave states
|
|
gptkbp:is_criticized_for
|
yes
abolitionists
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
gptkb:U._S._Congress
gptkb:House_of_Representatives
gptkb:Senate
Senate and House of Representatives
the 31st Congress
|
|
gptkbp:is_opposed_by
|
gptkb:Southern_fire-eaters
abolitionists
|
|
gptkbp:key_event
|
gptkb:American_history
pre-Civil War America
|
|
gptkbp:led_to
|
increased sectional conflict
formation of the Republican Party
California entering as a free state
strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Act
|
|
gptkbp:negotiated_by
|
gptkb:North_and_South
free states and slave states
free and slave states
Northern and Southern politicians
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
gptkb:American_history
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
California admitted as a free state
Abolition of slave trade in D. C.
Popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico
Stronger Fugitive Slave Law
|
|
gptkbp:part_of
|
Compromise of 1850 package
|
|
gptkbp:passes_through
|
gptkb:U._S._Congress
|
|
gptkbp:proposed_by
|
gptkb:Henry_Clay
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:Fugitive_Slave_Act
Westward expansion
California statehood
popular sovereignty
slavery debate
Texas boundary dispute
territorial status of Utah
slave trade in Washington D. C.
territorial status of New Mexico
|
|
gptkbp:repealed_by
|
gptkb:Kansas-Nebraska_Act
gptkb:Missouri_Compromise
|
|
gptkbp:resulted_in
|
divided opinions in Congress
|
|
gptkbp:signed_by
|
gptkb:Millard_Fillmore
President Millard Fillmore
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Attempt to ease tensions between North and South
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_catalyst_for
|
future legislation on slavery
political debates on states' rights
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_compromise_that_addressed
|
territorial expansion
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_compromise_that_aimed_to_prevent
|
gptkb:Civil_War
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_compromise_that_had_long-term_effects_on
|
U. S. politics.
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_compromise_that_included
|
the admission of California
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_compromise_that_involved
|
the status of slavery in new territories
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_compromise_that_reflected
|
the divisions in American society
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_compromise_that_sought_to_balance
|
the interests of different regions
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_legislative_effort_to
|
maintain the Union
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_response_to
|
gptkb:Mexican-American_War
admission of California
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_response_to_sectional_conflict
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_result_of
|
gptkb:California_Gold_Rush
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_turning_point_for
|
American politics
|
|
gptkbp:was_characterized_by
|
gptkb:political_negotiations
bipartisan support
|
|
gptkbp:was_followed_by
|
further sectional conflicts
|
|
gptkbp:was_influenced_by
|
gptkb:public_opinion
public sentiment
economic interests
|
|
gptkbp:was_part_of
|
compromises over slavery
Compromise of 1850 package
|
|
gptkbp:was_part_of_a_series_of_compromises
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:was_seen_as_a_failure
|
in the long term
|
|
gptkbp:was_seen_as_a_temporary_solution
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:was_supported_by
|
moderate politicians
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
1850
|