Gonzales v. Castle Rock, Colorado

GPTKB entity

Statements (54)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instance_of gptkb:legal_case
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Jessica_Gonzales
gptkbp:case_types Civil rights case
03-1023
Appealed from lower courts
Arguments on due process rights
Involves police response to domestic violence
Majority ruled against Gonzales
Part of legal history on police duties
gptkbp:consequences Clarified police liability
Impact on future police conduct
Influenced state laws on police duties
gptkbp:context Restraining order enforcement
gptkbp:court gptkb:Castle_Rock,_Colorado
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:Jessica_Gonzales
Discretionary enforcement
Failure to protect children
gptkbp:decided_by gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 27, 2005
gptkbp:effective_date gptkb:2003
gptkb:2005
gptkbp:historical_significance Police accountability
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Gonzales v. Castle Rock, Colorado
gptkbp:is_cited_in 545 U. S. 748
gptkbp:judges Justices of the Supreme Court
gptkbp:judicial_review Supreme Court review
gptkbp:jurisdiction Federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legal_issue gptkb:legal_case
Due Process Clause
Arguments presented by both sides
Context of police powers
Due process and police duty
Framework for understanding police liability
No duty to protect
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:political_movement
gptkbp:outcome Affirmed lower court ruling
No constitutional violation found
Significant for civil rights law
No liability for failure to act
Police did not have a constitutional duty to enforce restraining orders
Examined police discretion
Future police conduct
Highlighted limitations of police powers
No constitutional duty established
Supreme Court decision upheld lower court
gptkbp:precedent Influenced future cases regarding police duty
Set precedent for police liability cases
gptkbp:public_perception gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
Controversial decision
gptkbp:related_to domestic violence
gptkbp:significance Impact on police responsibility