Glenister v. President of the Republic of South Africa
GPTKB entity
Properties (41)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
Docket 10/2010
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
CCT 48/10
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Constitutional_Court
unconstitutional legislation Johannesburg,_South_Africa |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Constitutional_Court_of_South_Africa
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Glenister v. President of the Republic of South Africa
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced_anti-corruption_measures_in_South_Africa
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Moseneke
gptkb:Justice_Ngcobo gptkb:Justice_Zondo gptkb:Justice_Yacoob gptkb:Justice_Khampepe gptkb:Justice_O'Regan 2011-03-17 Justice Skweyiya Justice Jafta Justice Mogoeng |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Constitution of South Africa
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
principle of legality
principle of transparency principle of accountability principle of separation of powers principle of good governance Glenister was represented by legal counsel President was represented by the state attorney independence_of_the_Directorate_of_Special_Operations |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_in_favor_of_Glenister
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:President_of_the_Republic_of_South_Africa
Glenister |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Ngcobo
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
sets a precedent for future cases regarding state institutions
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Glenister_v._South_African_Police_Service
gptkb:Glenister_v._Minister_of_Justice_and_Correctional_Services Glenister v. Minister of Safety and Security Glenister v. National Director of Public Prosecutions President_of_the_Republic_of_South_Africa_v._Glenister |
| gptkbp:significance |
affirms the importance of institutional independence
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2010-11-02
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
2011-03-17
|