Statements (37)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:associated_with |
freedom from unreasonable searches
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
tort law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Borough
John Entick Nathan Carrington |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Court_of_King's_Bench
1765 |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
18th century England
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Entick v Carrington
|
| gptkbp:impact |
human rights law
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
subsequent case law
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
Magna Carta principles
|
| gptkbp:involves |
John Entick
Nathan Carrington |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
(1765) 19 St Tr 1029
R v Home Secretary R v Leech |
| gptkbp:is_discussed_in |
legal textbooks
|
| gptkbp:is_referenced_in |
constitutional law discussions
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Camden
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
government actions
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
privacy rights
unlawful search and seizure protection against arbitrary state action |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
Entick v Carrington (1765)
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:Judge
landmark ruling affirmed individual rights ruled in favor of Entick unlawful to enter without a warrant |
| gptkbp:part_of |
legal history of the UK
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
civil liberties cases
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
English common law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established principles of privacy
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Lord_Denning
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|