Davis v. Federal Election Commission

Target entity: Davis v. Federal Election Commission
Context triple: [Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, challengedInCase, Davis v. Federal Election Commission]

• A. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• B. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
• C. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
  Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
• D. Buckley v. Valeo
  Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
• E. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
  U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that held states cannot impose term limits on members of Congress beyond those specified in the U.S. Constitution.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Davis v. Federal Election Commission
Target entity description: Davis v. Federal Election Commission is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the “millionaire’s amendment” to federal campaign finance law as an unconstitutional burden on self-financed candidates’ First Amendment rights.

• A. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• B. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
• C. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
  Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
• D. Buckley v. Valeo
  Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
• E. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
  U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that held states cannot impose term limits on members of Congress beyond those specified in the U.S. Constitution.
• F. None of above. chosen