John Catron

E938879

John Catron was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court in the mid-19th century, known for his pro-slavery views and participation in landmark cases such as Dred Scott v. Sandford.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
John Catron canonical 3

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
person
appointedBy Andrew Jackson
birthDate 1786-01-07
birthPlace Pennsylvania
Wythe County, Virginia (then part of Virginia, later Tennessee region)
burialPlace Mount Olivet Cemetery, Nashville, Tennessee
citizenship United States of America
country United States of America
deathDate 1865-05-30
deathPlace Nashville, Tennessee
educatedAt self-taught in law
ethnicGroup European American
gender male
ideology pro-slavery
knownFor concurring opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford
support for the expansion of slavery into U.S. territories
language English
legalPhilosophy pro-slavery constitutional interpretation
memberOf Supreme Court of the United States
militaryRank soldier
nominatedAsJusticeIn 1837
notableCase Dred Scott v. Sandford
Luther v. Borden
United States v. Rogers
notableWork Dred Scott v. Sandford
occupation judge
lawyer
participatedIn Dred Scott v. Sandford
partOf Taney Court
politicalAlignment Jacksonian Democrat
linked to: Jacksonian Party
positionHeld Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
practicedLawIn Tennessee
priorPosition chief justice of the Tennessee Supreme Court of Errors and Appeals
justice of the Tennessee Supreme Court of Errors and Appeals
religion Methodist
residence Nashville, Tennessee
servedIn War of 1812
servedUnderChiefJustice Roger B. Taney
linked to: Roger Brooke Taney
supported slavery
states’ rights
termEnd 1865
termStart 1837

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (3)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Prize Cases dissentingJustices John Catron
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge dissentingOpinionBy John Catron