Hoke v. United States
E934449
Hoke v. United States is a 1913 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government’s power under the Commerce Clause to regulate and criminalize the interstate transportation of women for prostitution under the Mann Act.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Hoke v. United States canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11576370 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hoke v. United States Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court, hasNotableCase, Hoke v. United States]
-
A.
Herring v. United States
Herring v. United States is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that further limited the application of the exclusionary rule by holding that evidence need not be suppressed when obtained through isolated police negligence rather than deliberate or reckless misconduct.
-
B.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
C.
Hurd v. Hodge
Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
E.
Reese v. United States
Reese v. United States is an 1876 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal enforcement of African Americans’ voting rights under the Fifteenth Amendment during the Reconstruction era.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hoke v. United States Target entity description: Hoke v. United States is a 1913 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government’s power under the Commerce Clause to regulate and criminalize the interstate transportation of women for prostitution under the Mann Act.
-
A.
Herring v. United States
Herring v. United States is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that further limited the application of the exclusionary rule by holding that evidence need not be suppressed when obtained through isolated police negligence rather than deliberate or reckless misconduct.
-
B.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
C.
Hurd v. Hodge
Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
D.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
E.
Reese v. United States
Reese v. United States is an 1876 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal enforcement of African Americans’ voting rights under the Fifteenth Amendment during the Reconstruction era.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (38)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
federal criminal law case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
criminal law ⓘ federal jurisdiction ⓘ interstate commerce regulation ⓘ |
| branchOfGovernment | judicial branch of the United States ⓘ |
| citation | 227 U.S. 308 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1913 ⓘ |
| effect |
expanded federal authority over interstate moral regulation
ⓘ
strengthened the constitutionality of the Mann Act ⓘ |
| genre | judicial opinion ⓘ |
| holding |
Congress may regulate and criminalize the interstate transportation of women for prostitution under the Commerce Clause
ⓘ
interstate transportation of women for purposes of prostitution or debauchery is within the reach of federal regulation ⓘ the Mann Act is a valid exercise of Congress’s power over interstate commerce NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| languageOfWork | English ⓘ |
| lawApplied |
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Mann Act NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of the Mann Act
ⓘ
federal power to regulate interstate transportation for immoral purposes ⓘ scope of the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| partyType |
United States government as prosecutor
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
criminal defendant ⓘ |
| precedentFor | later Commerce Clause cases involving moral regulation ⓘ |
| publicationMedium | United States Reports NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Caminetti v. United States
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Champion v. Ames NERFINISHED ⓘ The Lottery Case NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
federal police power debates
ⓘ
regulation of prostitution ⓘ white slavery legislation ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
federal criminalization of immoral commerce
ⓘ
interstate transportation of women for prostitution ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1913 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Hoke v. United States Description of subject: Hoke v. United States is a 1913 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government’s power under the Commerce Clause to regulate and criminalize the interstate transportation of women for prostitution under the Mann Act.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.